Why PM Modi Faces A Massive Smear Campaign?

IN INDIA, IT’S NEVER ABOUT IDEOLOGY. IT IS ONLY ABOUT CIVILIZATION. AND TO PUT IT ON RECORD THIS IS WHY PM MODI FACES A MASSIVE SMEAR CAMPAIGN FROM A POWERFUL LOBBY. BUT THIS DID NOT START IN 2014. IT STARTED LONG AGO, WE HAVE TO GO BACK BY CENTURIES TO UNDERSTAND THIS.

INDIA WASN’T BORN IN 1947, BECAUSE UNLIKE MANY OTHER COUNTRIES WE GOT INDEPENDENT AND NOT CREATED AFRESH. THEREFORE, WHAT HAPPENED BEFORE 1947 IS AS IMPORTANT AS WHAT HAPPENED AFTER 1947. The most underrated event in our history being the KALINGA WAR of 265 BC.

The war changed ASHOKA, the famous Mauryan ruler but it would also change India for centuries to come. The emperor became a pacifist. Whatever be his own ideology, it is very easy to confuse reluctance to wage war with a senselessly defensive mindset.

For years to come, the INDIAN CIVILIZATION became utterly DEFENSIVE. Succeeding Indian dynasties and emperors would avoid expansionism. But their ability to perceive and pre-empt threats also went down. COMPROMISE AND FORGIVENESS BECAME THE KEYWORDS OF OUR CIVILIZATION.

The Ashoka syndrome would soon become the Prithviraj syndrome. Indians have been valiant warriors, but the issue is that of excessive magnanimity. Prithviraj Chauhan defeated Muhammad of Ghori in the 11th century, but let him go. Later, Ghori defeated Prithviraj and blinded him.

In the course of this thread, you will realize how we would keep getting betrayed just like Prithviraj Chauhan another 10 centuries later. Anyway, Prithviraj Chauhan’s unnecessary magnanimity allowed the Islamic conquest of India. This, of course, led to centuries of plunder.

After the KALINGA WAR, we never achieved a system that would match up to the aggression against INDIAN CIVILIZATION. The unnecessarily defensive regime would give way to Islamic conquest, and Islamic conquest would give way to the BRITISH RAJ.

Needless to mention, social thinkers and commoners also became timid about their own CIVILIZATION. BRITISHERS made us believe that we were misogynist and archaic. Some of our most celebrated social thinkers relentlessly promoted BRITISH education as a panacea.

As I told you, everything is about CIVILIZATION. Every successive regime shamed anyone who tried to stand up for CIVILIZATION PRIDE. BRITISH ERA to gave way for the NEHRUVIAN ERA. India’s political leadership again ordained that India would adopt strategic restraint.

CHINA ENTERED OUR TERRITORY. SO INDIA’S FIRST PRIME MINISTER NEHRU said, “NOT A BLADE OF GRASS GROWS IN THOSE BARREN MOUNTAINS”. Of course, no one in the intellectual lobby protested. NEHRU was doing what they wanted him to do. Be magnanimous to the extent of being self-harming.

NEHRU was only continuing what started with the Kalinga war. Then came INDIRA. She suffered the Prithviraj syndrome. Won the 1971 war, but gave away the exploits in SHIMLA AGREEMENT. Pak turned another Ghori. ISI came up with a doctrine bleed-India through a thousand cuts.

This doesn’t end here. VAJPAYEE faced the wrath of the ecosystem for many reasons. The only thing they don’t criticize him for is not crossing the LoC during the 1999 KARGIL WAR. This is again a manifestation of extreme generosity. PAKISTAN COULD CROSS THE LOC BUT NOT INDIA.

The PARLIAMENT ATTACK happened, we didn’t retaliate. OPERATION PARAKRAM never materialized into anything. A few years later, 26/11 HAPPENED. But India’s then PM MANMOHAN SINGH chose “STRATEGIC RESTRAINT”. No one in the powerful lobby criticized him.

AS LONG AS YOU DON’T GO BEYOND THE LAKSHMAN-REKHA THAT HAS BEEN DRAWN BY CENTURIES OF TIMIDITY, NO ONE WILL REBUKE YOU. BUT India WENT A STEP FURTHER.

PAKISTAN ATTACKED IN URI, SO THE PARA SF CAUSED DAMAGE TO TERROR LAUNCH PADS ACROSS THE LOC.

WITH THE BALAKOT AIR STRIKES, WE STILL WENT SEVERAL STEPS FURTHER. OF COURSE, HE IS HATED. AFTER SEVERAL CENTURIES, INDIA IS NOW PRE-EMPTING THREATS. WE HAD STOPPED PRE-EMPTING IN 265 BC, HOW COME WE COULD PRE-EMPT NOW?!

Authored by a Retd. Army Officer🏹⚔️⚔️⚔️🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

Indian Diaspora and their implications in recent times